TY - JOUR
TI - Comparison of ADCP observations and 3D model simulations of turbulence at a tidal energy site
AU - Togneri, M
AU - Lewis, M
AU - Neill, S
AU - Masters, I
T2 - Renewable Energy
AB - Field measurement of turbulence in strong tidal currents is difficult and expensive, but the tidal energy industry needs to accurately quantify turbulence for adequate resource characterisation and device design. Models that can predict such turbulence could reduce measurement costs. We compare a Regional Ocean Modelling System (ROMS) simulation with acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) measurements from a highly-energetic tidal site. This comparison shows the extent to which turbulence can be quantified by ROMS, using the conventional k -  ε turbulence closure model. Both model and observations covered the same time period, encompassing two spring-neap cycles. Turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) density was calculated from measurements using the variance method; turbulent dissipation, ε, was calculated using the structure function method. Measurements show that wave action dominates turbulent fluctuations in the upper half of the water column; comparing results for deeper water, however, shows very strong agreement. A best fit between ROMS and ADCP results for mean velocity yields R2 = 0.98; for TKE, R2 is 0.84 when strongly wave-dominated times are excluded. Dissipation agrees less well: although time series of ε are well-correlated at similar depths, ROMS estimates a greater magnitude of dissipation than is measured, by a factor of up to 4.8.
DA - 2017/12//
PY - 2017
VL - 114
IS - Part A
SP - 273
EP - 282
UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148117302537
DO - 10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.061
LA - English
KW - Changes in Flow
KW - Physical Environment
ER -